Title : [theqoo] THE REASON WHY IT'S OK FOR KIM YEON KOUNG AND WOO SANG HYEOK TO HAVE TATTOOS AND NOT BTS
link : [theqoo] THE REASON WHY IT'S OK FOR KIM YEON KOUNG AND WOO SANG HYEOK TO HAVE TATTOOS AND NOT BTS
[theqoo] THE REASON WHY IT'S OK FOR KIM YEON KOUNG AND WOO SANG HYEOK TO HAVE TATTOOS AND NOT BTS
Tattoos of sports players are welcomed on TV, but most tattoos are still 'taboos'. Celebrities such as idols appearing on music shows and entertainment programs usually come out with their tattoos covered with a band-aid.
What is the reason for covering up the tattoos of celebrities, unlike athletes? Initially, there were no related provisions regulating 'having tattoos'.
An official from the Korea Communications Standards Commission said, "There is no specific broadcast review regulation that specifically addressed tattoos and not such thing as 'you must not appear on TV with a tattoo'."
However, "It can be deliberated according to the contents that hinder ethics and dignity," he said. "We cannot unconditionally regulate the appearance of tattoos on broadcast, but we can review it according to the content and context. We need to look at the details of the broadcast."
Then why isn't tattoos exposure during the Olympic Games a problem? The committee said, "There is not much room for intervention in the 'broadcasting' of the Olympics because the broadcasting companies do not produce the video."
An official from a terrestrial broadcaster said, "Even if celebrities cover their tattoos before the program is produced, if they see a tattoo that wasn't discovered during the recording, they must cover it and re-record it." he said. "Because the vigilance committee can impose sanctions depending on the 'context', broadcasting companies seem to be giving a warning in advance after internal deliberation."
original post: here
1. I was curious about how many tattoos Jungkook has right now and was so shocked when I looked him up
2. Jungkook: But I didn't even say anything
3. Idols should be able to get tattoos too. But same as idols, athletes should cover up their tattoos when they appear on national TV
4. Why do you guys always bring up my bias in this kind of post? Cut it down
5. It's my first time learning that there's no regulation surrounding it
6. Are there no other celebrities in our country aside from Bangtan? Why does everything need to be linked to Bangtan?
7. The fact that tattoos are illegal makes me wonder if I'm really living in the 21st centuryㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
8. It's because there are too many trolls in idols' fandoms
9. But they still cover them when they are not in competition and appear on TV... I like the way it is now
10. Of course they should cover them up. I f*cking hate tattoos
11. Our country's not the one filming the Olympics so duh..
12. But even athletes cover themselves up when they go on variety shows no?
13. That's too much;;;;;;;
14. I thought that Woo Sang Hyeok's tattoo was a sticker.. looks like it's real
15. Their tattoos are clean and pretty... but honestly, Jungkook has too many
16. Why do you guys care so much about other people's body?ㅡㅡ did you guys give birth to them?
17. Because they are idols ㅋㅋㅋ they will get so much hate
18. Why are you summoning Bangtan when they are just staying still?ㅋㅋㅋㅋ you guys just wanna hate on them
19. This is such a non issueㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
20. You'd think that Bangtan did something
Thus Articles [theqoo] THE REASON WHY IT'S OK FOR KIM YEON KOUNG AND WOO SANG HYEOK TO HAVE TATTOOS AND NOT BTS
Sekianlah artikel [theqoo] THE REASON WHY IT'S OK FOR KIM YEON KOUNG AND WOO SANG HYEOK TO HAVE TATTOOS AND NOT BTS This Time, Hopefully can provide benefits to you all. Okay, see you in another article post.
You are read Articles [theqoo] THE REASON WHY IT'S OK FOR KIM YEON KOUNG AND WOO SANG HYEOK TO HAVE TATTOOS AND NOT BTS With a link https://koreancelebri.blogspot.com/2021/08/theqoo-reason-why-its-ok-for-kim-yeon.html